City of Elsa v. M.A.L.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice RODRIGUEZ.
Appellant, the City of Elsa, Texas (the City), brings this accelerated interlocutory appeal following the trial court’s denial of its plea to the jurisdiction. 1 By two issues, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying its plea to the jurisdiction because (1) it is immune from suit under the Texas Medical Practice Act (the Act) and (2) appellees, M.A.L., F.B., and A.G., are prohibited from seeking monetary damages for alleged constitutional violations and do not have standing to assert their equitable relief claims. We affirm in part and reverse…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Elsa v. M.A.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Arlington v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- City of Arlington, Texas and Alison Turner v. Mark Allen Randall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- City of Arlington, Texas and Alison Turner v. Mark Allen Randall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- City of Arlington, Texas and Alison Turner v. Mark Allen Randall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.