Stulz v. Bacon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STURTEVANT, J. —
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover the amount due on an alleged judgment. The defendant appeared and filed a demurrer. In said demurrer he alleged that the complaint did *649not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him; that the cause of action was barred by the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 336, subdivision 1 of section 337, and the provisions of section 343 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The trial court made an order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend. Prom the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Feeney v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turner v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942