Legal Opinion

Suburban/Bustleton Pharmacy, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Aging

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Suburban/Bustleton Pharmacy, Inc. (Suburban) petitions this Court to review the order of the Secretary of the Department of Aging (DOA) which denied Suburban’s appeal from DOA’s decision to terminate Suburban’s participation in the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) program for a period of five years. We affirm.

On May 29, 1987, Jay Pollock (Pollock) and John Dzierza (Dzierza), owners of Suburban, were arrested and charged with approximately eighteen hundred counts of Medicaid fraud and with conspiracy. Both Pollock and Dzierza resigned as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Muehleisen v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Dillon by Dillon v. Nat. Rr Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Jack v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Reynolds v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norris v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Barron v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Canteen Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Canteen Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API