Legal Opinion

Milbank v. Duggan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 3, 1942No. 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint upon the merits in an action against a collector of internal revenue to recover income taxes which were unlawfully collected for the year 1932. It is conceded that the amount in dispute was unlawfully collected and the only issue is whether the plaintiff filed any claim for refund within the period limited by § 322(b) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 571— two years after the tax was paid. The deficiency assessed and paid arose because, although the plaintiff had contributed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. PleasantsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Pleasants v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Milbank v. DugganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  4. T. J. West Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  5. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API