Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 10, 1982No. Civ. 2924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a mandamus proceeding challenging the authority of a trial court to set aside a summary judgment more than ninety (90) days after the filing of an application for rehearing (filed within 30 days of the summary judgment). Stated differently, does the ninety (90) days limitation of ARCP rule 59.1 apply to an application for rehearing of the granting of a summary judgment so as to deny the trial court the jurisdiction to rule on the motion?

Post trial motions filed within 30 days of the judgment have generally been held to be ARCP rule 59 motions subject to time limitation of rule 59.1.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Carnes v. CarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Simmons v. SimmonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Holt v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Cleveland v. HareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Johnson Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Haynes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Continental Grain Co. v. SmallwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Bugg v. Sofran Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API