Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Pratt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 30, 1982No. 4981-3-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

Does a trial court have inherent power to enter a dissolution decree nunc pro tunc after the death of the husband if, before the death, the court had decided the case on the merits, attorneys for both parties had approved the findings, conclusions and decree and the delay was due to collateral reasons? We hold that entry of the decree nunc pro tunc under these circumstances was proper.

Mr. and Mrs. Pratt were married on November 11, 1978, but separated 4 months later. Mr. Pratt filed for divorce. At the dissolution hearing on February 26, 1980, the court dissolved the marriage and made a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Cameron v. CameronWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Mutual Savings Bank v. Doud (In Re Doud)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
  2. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API