Legal Opinion

Magauran v. Tiffany

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

—I do not think that the demurrer of the defendant Tiffany is well- taken. The plaintiff may not be entitled to all the relief he asks, but the prayer to the complaint is not a subject of demurrer. The question arises, under the issue of law — which concedes for-the present purpose all the allegations of fact which the complaint alleges — is the plaintiff entitled to any- relief ?

The agreement with respect to the forty shares of stock is alleged to have been made with both defendants. They jointly agreed that each defendant should hold in trust for *252the plaintiff twenty shares of stock until…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Le Clare v. ThibaultOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Patterson v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Warner v. WarnerNew York City Court · 1886
  4. Fahr v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Mahr v. Norwich Fire Insurance SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API