Legal Opinion

State v. Richards

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 17, 1999No. 99-K-0067PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

750 So.2d 940 (1999)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Rodney RICHARDS.

No. 99-K-0067.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 17, 1999.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Valentin Michael Solino, Counsel for Applicant.

Bart Stapert, Mark Daniel MacNamara, New Orleans, Counsel for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:[*]

Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), precludes the state from impeaching a defendant's testimony at trial with evidence that he remained silent immediately after his arrest and after receiving the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. DubrocLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. State v. MarloweLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. ArmsteadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. State v. LenseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API