Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Price
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentAndrews, J.
An issue presented by the record and in the briefs in this case is not considered 'in the opinion of my associates. Eor that reason I am forced to dissent
The record in this case shows the evidence was taken by Mrs. Roblin, one of the members of the State Industrial Commission, and that an award based upon the findings of fact made by her and concurred in by the three members of the State Industrial Commission was made under date of October 4, 1930. Thereafter the two members of the State Industrial Commission, who had not heard the evidence and whose knowledge thereof was confined to that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Creamer v. BivertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Calvert v. CarpenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- United States v. Lee HuenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1902
- Curtis v. Bank of DoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925