Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Dudding

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. — Hon. A. A. Whit sett, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action for fraud and deceit commenced in a justice court by the filing of the following statement: M. A. Dudding to

Bishop Stratton, Dr.

To damages sustained from misrepresentation as to value, age and condition of one certain milch cow, bought from the said M. A.

Dudding, on Feb. 8, 1910 ..............,.$25.00.

A trial in the circuit court where the cause was taken by appeal resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant and plaintiff appealed. Counsel for defendant attack the sufficiency of the statement to plead a cause of action and invoke the well-recognized rule that a mere…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Iba v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. State Bank v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Phelps v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DobbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Pope v. FloreaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Ball v. GrismoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Hoffman v. Hiram Lloyd Building & Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Interstate Tire Co. v. Gillette Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API