Legal Opinion

Mester v. Morgenstern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 23, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff is the owner of one-half interest in the partnership which by its terms has been terminated by plaintiff’s election to terminate given in the partnership agreement. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to a full accounting of all the assets belonging to the partnership.

On argument both sides stipulated to go to trial in the May, 1953, term of the court on completion of necessary examinations before trial. Under all the facts and circumstances disclosed, the appointment of a receiver pendente lite of the partnership assets was not necessary. We also hold that on this record Special…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halle v. HalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Corigliano v. Deborah CoriglianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API