Legal Opinion

Ruthinoski v. Brinkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*901In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated May 9, 2008, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

This appeal arises out of a collision between a motorcycle operated by the plaintiff and a minivan operated by the defendant, which occurred on Peconic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Management, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Exime v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Batal v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Eastmond v. Wen Po WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scopin v. GoolsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Ciraldo v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Mendelovitz v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Rivera v. FrittsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Moe v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API