Legal Opinion

Pfaffenback v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1895No. 17,441PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellant sued the appellee, claiming damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by him while a passenger upon the appellee’s train, and from the appellee’s negligence in permitting said train to collide with another train standing upon an *248open switch. Upon a trial by jury, there was a verdict for the appellee. The only error assigned in this court is the action of the trial court in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial. There are eight alleged errors discussed: 1. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. 2. Ordering the appellant to give…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Reed v. SpaydeIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Cates v. ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. City of New Albany v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Strebin v. LavengoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Haddon v. CrawfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Working v. GarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API