Legal Opinion

Artale v. Columbia Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

The application under the petition filed in this ease is that the court shall determine and enforce an attorney’s lien for service under chapter 201 of the laws of 1914 (at p. 410), on a sum of money claimed to be due on a judgment recovered in an action by his clients, Emanuel and Mamie Artaie, against the Columbia Insurance Company. Notice of the application appears to have been given to counsel for the insurance company, defendant, but nowhere does it appear that a like notice was given to the plaintiffs in the action.

The act in question…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Artale v. Columbia Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API