Legal Opinion

Catalano v. International Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of Buffalo. Action by Philip Catalano against the International Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This action was originally begun against the Crosstown Street Railway Company, but inasmuch as since the commencement of this action the Crosstown Street Railway Company was merged and consolidated with the International Railway Company, and ceased to exist as a separate corporation, therefore said International Railway Company was substituted as a defendant in the place and stead of the original defendant the Crosstown Street Railway Company. The action was begun to recover a penalty of $50, for a failure and refusal to deliver to him a transfer from the Crosstown road entitling him to ride…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Braffett v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. O'Reilly v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Village of Watkins v. Welch Grape Juice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenk v. International Ry. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API