Legal Opinion

Vertentes v. Barletta Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 11, 1984PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The plaintiff, Joao Vertentes, seeks further appellate review pursuant to G. L. c. 211A, § 11, after a decision of the Appeals Court.1 The Appeals Court reversed the judgment on a jury verdict which had awarded him $900,000, for injuries suffered when he was struck by a motor vehicle in the course of his employment as a construction worker on a highway rebuilding project. Vertentes v. Barletta Co., 16 Mass. App. Ct. 463 (1983).2 After reviewing the factual and legal issues presented, we reverse the judgment of the Superior Court.

The defendant, The Barletta Company, Inc. (Barletta), contracted…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Florida Power and Light Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  5. Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lane T. Mele v. Fitchburg District CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Papadopoulos v. Target CorporationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. BurnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API