Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Keohane
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8230 (GLG)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
This petition for habeas corpus presents the recently recurring issue of appellate delay. The facts presented to the court in the petition and in the opposition papers are less than crystal clear. The facts pertinent to resolution of the petition, however, do not appear to require an evidentiary hearing.
FACTS
The petitioner was involved with two co-defendants in a sordid crime which commenced in the state of Connecticut. Three persons approached a man and a woman in a parking lot of a hotel in Stamford, Connecticut as they were about to enter an automobile. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Norman Simmons v. Edward F. Reynolds, Superintendent, Oneida Correctional Facility, and the People of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Jasper Roberson, Relator-Appellant v. State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Homer Aki Mathis v. David Hood, Superintendent, Otisville Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Wheeler v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.