Seaman v. . the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 27, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover under two separate causes of action.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 27, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover under two separate causes of action. The first cause of action alleged the employment in March, 1905, of the plaintiff by the defendant, acting by and through the president of the borough of Queens, to prepare and furnish to the defendant all of the plans and specifications, etc., for the erection and full completion, together with the supervision of…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Trainer v. City of CovingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Johnson v. JohansenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Piani v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Sebring v. StarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.