Legal Opinion

Woodworth v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 2000No. 2D00-1543PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Acting Chief Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Timothy Woodworth appeals the denial of his motion to quash service of process. He argues that the trial court erred in finding compliance with the requirements for substituted service in chapter 48, Florida Statutes (1997). We agree and reverse.

The trial court found that Mr. Woodworth had actual notice based on regular mail. The statutory requirements for substituted service of process are strictly construed. See George Fischer, Ltd. v. Plastiline, Inc., 379 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Pertinent to this case, the statute requires that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. HaeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. George Fischer Ltd. v. Plastiline, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Oteman, S.A. v. NapolesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. WarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API