In the Interest of C.F.-h., Minor Child, C.H., Father
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
APPEL, Justice.
In this case, we are asked to consider when a child has been “removed from the physical care” of parents for at least twelve of the last eighteen months, thereby establishing a necessary element for termination of parental rights under Iowa Code section 232.116(l)(e) and (f) (2016). According to the parties on appeal, the father at no time had actual physical custody of the child. Nonetheless, the district *202court determined that for purposes of the statute, the child should be considered “removed” from the father’s physical care for the requisite time period to support a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- In Re the Marriage of FredericiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- In Defense of Animals v. U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed WitnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John ErpeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. Iowa Public Employment Relations Board and State of Iowa and Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John ErpeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018