Legal Opinion

Edward S. Gordon Co. v. Blodnick, Schultz & Abramowitz, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), *213entered February 24, 1988, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the second cause of action and for dismissal of the counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

In this action to recover a brokerage commission on the procurement of a sublease, plaintiff alleges in its second cause of action that it is the intended third-party beneficiary of certain agreements between defendants Blodnick, Schultz & Abramowitz, P. C. (BSA), a firm of attorneys, and Midland International Marketing Services…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Ficor, Inc. v. National Kinney Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Gelb v. Bucknell Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cauff, Lippman & Co. v. Apogee Finance Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Newmark & Co. Real Estate Inc. v. 2615 East 17 Street Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. India.Com, Inc. v. DalalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. India.com, Inc. v. DalalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Polat v. Fifty CPW Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API