Legal Opinion

Dijon Allen Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 2, 2013No. 0197122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDER, Judge.

Dijon Allen Smith (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial for burglary in violation of Code § 18.2-90 and using a firearm in the commission of that offense in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. On appeal, he contends the burglary was complete before he used or displayed the gun and, thus, that the evidence fails to support his conviction for using a firearm in the commission of burglary. We hold the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was sufficient to support the challenged conviction. 1 Thus, we affirm.

In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMorris v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Rushing v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  3. Rowland v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  4. Cromite v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Choon Poong Lee v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
  2. Randell Louis Kinlaw v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API