Dijon Allen Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Dijon Allen Smith (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial for burglary in violation of Code § 18.2-90 and using a firearm in the commission of that offense in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. On appeal, he contends the burglary was complete before he used or displayed the gun and, thus, that the evidence fails to support his conviction for using a firearm in the commission of burglary. We hold the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was sufficient to support the challenged conviction. 1 Thus, we affirm.
In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMorris v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Rushing v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Rowland v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Cromite v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Choon Poong Lee v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Randell Louis Kinlaw v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017