Legal Opinion
Nino v. Paul T.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 1971No. Civ. 26523PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, J.
On October 24, 1968, a petition was filed in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, sitting as a juvenile court, alleging that appellants, Paul and Peter T., persons under 21 years of age, 1 came within the provisions of section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. 2 The petition alleged appellants had participated in the entry of a building of Santa Clara Honda Sales, with intent to commit theft therein, in violation of Penal Code section 459 (burglary).
A detention hearing was held on October 25, 1968, after notice to appellants and their mother, and after they had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Duck WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bryan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fare v. Wayne H.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Garth D.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. JetterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.