Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Ross' Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Thomas G. Sullivan presented a claim against the estate of James G. Ross, deceased. The claim was disallowed by the probate judge, and claimant appealed to the circuit court. From a judgment there for claimant, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Sullivan filed a claim against tne estate of Ross in probate court for $100,000. It was in form a petition, setting up the facts relied upon to establish his claim, which were in substance the following, viz.: Ross owned pine lands in Michigan. On November 7, 1883, a contract was made between him, under the name of Ross & Co., and Sullivan, wherein it was agreed “to sell all the pine [thereon] to Sullivan for one dollar and fifty cents per thousand feet, board measure,” which Sullivan agreed to pay, and to cut the timber before May 1, 1884. The contract contained the following provision:

“It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pierce v. CooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Mansfield Machine Works v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Platt v. BroderickMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Cudlipp v. C. R. Cummings Export Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API