Legal Opinion
Matter of Modestil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2016No. M-1773PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Marjorie Modestil was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on January 18, 1995. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
By notice of motion dated March 16, 2016, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) seeks an order pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 603.4 (e) (1) (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv), as well as Judiciary Law § 468-a, immediately suspending respondent from…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- In re SchulzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re MuriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re BloodsawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re GujralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re HestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of ShedrinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of ModestilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017