United States v. Phifer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT HER SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is defendant Crystal Phifer’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Section 2255 permits a court to grant relief “upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- William J. O'Hara III v. John T. Wigginton Wayne Dunn Al C. Parke and Fred CowanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lee v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022