Legal Opinion

Fradus Contracting Co. v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Fradus Contracting Company, Inc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of March, 1922, denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The former commissioner of street cleaning of the city of New York, John P. Leo, duly advertised for proposals to be submitted on the 9th of June, 1921, for unloading scows containing mixed ashes, street sweepings and rubbish, for one year commencing on the 1st day of July, 1921. The plaintiff duly presented a proposal, and, as it was the lowest bidder, the contract was finally awarded to it and was signed by both parties and became effective by the execution of the certificate by the comptroller on the 2d day of July, 1921. Rikers Island in the East river is owned by the city.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dailey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Dailey v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Saxon Motor Sales, Inc. v. TorinoNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API