Legal Opinion

W.R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation Dist.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 2007No. Record 060717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether two indemnification provisions in a construction contract are void as against public policy insofar as they entitle the indemnitee to be reimbursed by the indemnitor for costs and expenses incurred in the defense of a personal injury claim by a third party.

BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are undisputed. W.R. Hall, Inc. ("W. R. Hall"), a construction company, entered into a contract with the Hampton Roads Sanitation District ("HRSD") whereby W.R. Hall would install or replace various sewer lines in the City of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson's Adm'x v. Richmond & Danville R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  2. Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Community Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  3. Shuttleworth, Ruloff & Giordano, P.C. v. NutterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  4. Estes Exp. Lines v. Chopper Exp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estes Exp. Lines v. Chopper Exp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Newman v. L & H Co.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2012
  3. Parfait v. Swiftships, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API