W.R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation Dist.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Justice LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether two indemnification provisions in a construction contract are void as against public policy insofar as they entitle the indemnitee to be reimbursed by the indemnitor for costs and expenses incurred in the defense of a personal injury claim by a third party.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are undisputed. W.R. Hall, Inc. ("W. R. Hall"), a construction company, entered into a contract with the Hampton Roads Sanitation District ("HRSD") whereby W.R. Hall would install or replace various sewer lines in the City of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson's Adm'x v. Richmond & Danville R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Community Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Shuttleworth, Ruloff & Giordano, P.C. v. NutterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Estes Exp. Lines v. Chopper Exp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estes Exp. Lines v. Chopper Exp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Newman v. L & H Co.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2012
- Parfait v. Swiftships, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025