Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1921No. 7458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Waller County; J. D. Harvey, Judge. Action by W. R. Patterson against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (204 S. W. 1026), but was reversed and cause remanded to Court of Civil Appeals by the Supreme Court for consideration of defendant’s assignments 1 to 3, inclusive (228 S. W. 119).

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

At a former term this court declined to consider assignments of error 1 to 3, inclusive, and 8, as presented hy the plaintiff in error in this cause, and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 201 S. W. 1026.

On writ of error the Supreme Court has since held that we erred in refusing to entertain the first three of these assignments, and reversed and remanded the cause to this court, with direction that it consider these assignments. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Patterson, 228 S. W. 119. Pursuant to superior authority, that has accordingly been done.

The assignments are as follows:

“First. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. PattersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Stewart v. PoinbeoufCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. KuehnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Grimes v. Tracy-Maysfield Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Grimes v. Tracy-Maysfield Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API