Legal Opinion

Home Indem. Company v. Hoechst-Celanese Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1990No. 380P90PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

396 S.E.2d 611 (1990)

327 N.C. 428

The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, The Home Insurance Company and City Insurance Company

v.

HOECHST-CELANESE CORPORATION, Ace Insurance Company, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Aiu Insurance Company, et al.

No. 380P90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 1990.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, Charlotte, for Hoechst-Celanese Corp.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, for several appellants.

Bell, Davis & Pitt, Winston-Salem, and Rivkin, Radler, Bayh, Hart & Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y., for Commercial Union Ins. Co.

Sheft and Sheft, New York City, and Petree,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawyers Mutual Liability Insurance v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Cinoman v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Park East Sales v. Clark-Langley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Wachovia Bank v. Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, LTD.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API