Legal Opinion

Longyear v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 15, 1933No. Docket Nos. 47117, 56027, 62410Published

1. Petitioner and his divorced wife effected a settlement whereby petitioner, in lieu of alimony, delivered to the wife a note for $150,000 and agreed that a portion of his share of a trust created by his father's will should stand as security for the note.

Read the full summary

1. Petitioner and his divorced wife effected a settlement whereby petitioner, in lieu of alimony, delivered to the wife a note for $150,000 and agreed that a portion of his share of a trust created by his father's will should stand as security for the note. Held, that payments made to the wife in satisfaction of the note are taxable to petitioner as part of his distributive share of the trust estate. 2. Petitioner irrevocably assigned to trustees for the benefit of his children a portion of his interest in the trust created by his father's will. Held, that petitioner had divested himself of…

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN M. LONGYEAR, JR., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Longyear v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 47117, 56027, 62410.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

28 B.T.A. 1086; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1050;

August 15, 1933, Promulgated

1. Petitioner and his divorced wife effected a settlement whereby petitioner, in lieu of alimony, delivered to the wife a note for $150,000 and agreed that a portion of his share of a trust created by his father's will should stand as security for the note. Held, that payments made to the wife in satisfaction of the note are taxable to petitioner as part of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Longyear v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API