Legal Opinion

United States v. Harmon

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 6, 1989No. ACM 27638PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

A record of trial that is not substantially verbatim will not support a sentence that includes a punitive discharge. Article 54, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 854 R.C.M. 1103(f)(1); United States v. Desciscio, 22 M.J. 684 (A.F.C.M.R.1986). Missing unrecorded testimony can be reconstructed so as to make the record verbatim, but where the omission is substantial a presumption of prejudice arises and the burden is on the Government to rebut that presumption. United States v. Desciscio, supra.

*733In the appeal before us, a malfunctioning of the court reporter’s equipment permitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. LashleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. GarriesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. DesciscioU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. GriffinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KyleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. SnethenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. McCallumU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API