Legal Opinion
James v. Hoffman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 2018No. 27735PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, L. Morgan Banks, III; Stephen Behnke; Debra L. Dunivin; Larry C. James; and Russell Newman, appeal from a pair of decisions issued by the trial court on August 25, 2017, in which the court determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendants-appellees, the American Psychological Association ("APA"), Sidley Austin LLP ("Sidley-Austin"), and Sidley-Austin partner David Hoffman. Appellants argue that the trial court erred because Appellees purposefully engaged in certain activities within this state, because the causes of action set forth in the complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henderson v. SMC Prods., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Wiesenmayer v. VasporyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- AquaSeal Resurfacing LLC v. Jefcoat Recreation and Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019
- Vesi Incorporated v. Vera Bradley Designs Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020