Legal Opinion

Geidel v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks damages (including treble damages pursuant to section 861 of the Beal Property Actions and Proceedings Law) for cutting of trees and other injury to property located in St. Lawrence County. Plaintiff resides in both Nassau and St. Lawrence Counties and the action is, therefore, properly brought in Nassau, CPLB 503 (suhd. [a]), unless it must be considered an action affecting “ title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property ” within the meaning of CPLB 507, Beluctantly, the court concludes that it must order the change of venue sought, but in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. International Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Johnson v. MillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Freeman v. ThomsonNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dexter v. AlfredNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Hempstead v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API