Legal Opinion

Dannenberg v. Board of Regents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding, initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law, to review a determination of the Board of Regents, which revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine. Substantial evidence supports the Board of Regents determination that petitioner, a physician, was guilty of practicing the profession fraudulently (Education Law, § 6509, subd [2]) and of unprofessional conduct (Education Law, § 6509, subd [9]). The record contains evidence from which the board could properly conclude that on three separate occasions within a one-month period, petitioner…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. In re O'HaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Raguseo v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Dass v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charlan v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API