Legal Opinion

Diederich v. Rose

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1907No. Gen. No. 13,102Published

Bill in equity. Appeal from the Superior Court' of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

The contentions of appellant in this cause are that the Board of Canal Commissioners had legally the power on March 7, 1896, to make the lease it then made to the appellant; that the provision in said lease that if the appellant should be unsuccessful in obtaining a renewal of the same, the party to whom the Commissioners might lease the same should be required to purchase and pay for the buildings and structures owned by said appellant and situated on the land, at an appraised value, was made in view of and with reference to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gage v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Furey v. . Town of GravesendNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Rufner v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Traynor v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Granger v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois & Michigan CanalIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API