Legal Opinion
Williams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (In Re Williams)
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided January 19, 2000No. CV199-168PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, Senior District Judge.
Defendant, Sears, Roebuck, and Co., (“Sears”), has moved, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 23(d)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss Plaintiffs Class Action counts for want of jurisdiction. After careful consideration of the Defendant’s Motion, and Plaintiffs Response thereto, the Court will GRANT Defendant’s motion in part, and DENY it in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Terry Williams, filed a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on January 30, 1998 in the Augusta Division of the United States District Court for the Southern…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hardy v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of American Reserve Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Clear and Doris Elaine HuddlestonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- General Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bessette v. AVCO Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Kerney v. Capital One Financial Corp. (In Re Sims)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Tate v. NationsBanc Mortgage Corp. (In Re Tate)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Noletto v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. (In Re Noletto)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
- Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.