Legal Opinion

Collier v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 2011No. 49A04-1105-CR-229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Here, we are reminded of the old adage that it is not only what you say but how you say it. This is precisely why we grant trial courts the responsibility to determine whether a defendant has made his or her case in accordance with Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), which prohibits the exercise of racially discriminatory peremptory challenges. In this case, although the trial court determined that the Batson challenge was met, the defendant’s motion was denied because there was a “fair enough jury” to proceed. Under these circumstances,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Forrest v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eugene Roach v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Carlos Villaruel v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Darrin L. Burns v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API