Legal Opinion

State v. Allard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 17, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

Gary Allard appeals from a judgment of conviction for aggravated furnishing of a schedule Z drug, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1105 (1983 & Supp.1995) entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mills, J.) following his conditional guilty plea, M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). The plea preserved for appellate review the court’s (Marscmo, J.) denial of Allard’s motion to suppress the evidence resulting from a search of his person. Allard contends that the search violated his rights pursuant to both the United States and Maine Constitutions because the “any and all persons” search warrant was overly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. LamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. State v. RabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. State v. PriorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. United States v. GuadarramaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API