Loomis v. . Ruck
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
There is no ground upon which the judgment against the defendant Martha Ruck can be sustained. The note in suit was not made for the benefit of her separate estate, nor in the course of any separate business carried on by her, and although it purports in terms to charge her separate estate, yet it is found by the referee that her signature thereto was obtained from her by her husband, the defendant John Ruck, by duress, to enable him to take up another note previously given by him to the plaintiff for a debt contracted by Ruck, for his own benefit. The note in suit was drawn by the plaintiff…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Barry v. . Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Fairbanks v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Burchard v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Wilkerson v. HoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- Linderman v. . FarquharsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.