Legal Opinion

Ross v. American Express Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 2011No. MDL No. 1409; No. 04 Civ. 5723(WHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Robert Ross and Randal Wachsmuth bring this class action asserting Sherman Act violations against Defendants American Express Company, American Express Travel Related Services and American Express Centurion Bank (collectively, “Amex”). Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Amex and its competitors con*354spired to fix foreign currency conversion fees (the “FX Fee”) and to impose arbitration clauses in cardholder agreements. Amex moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the following reasons, Amex’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND1

I…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API