MATTER OF DOOLEY v. Coughlin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (134 AD2d 350). We add only that there was no abuse of discretion in ordering that respondent must accept State-ready inmates from petitioner’s custody within 14 days of sentencing unless exigent circumstances which justify a further limited delay are present in a particular case. (See also, Matter of Ayers v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 346 [decided today]).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dooley v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People ex rel. Morejon v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- Higgins v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1997