Graf v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, Judge.
On appeal from her conviction for arson and possession of cocaine and marijuana, Pamela Graf argues that the evidence was insufficient as to the arson count and that the trial court erred when it joined the arson and cocaine cases for trial, when it limited a defense expert’s testimony, and when it failed to hold a restitution hearing. We find no error and affirm.
*599“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Dingler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- McCart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Anthony Joe Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Nelson v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014