Legal Opinion
Cross v. Whedon
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1979No. Docket 78-816PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P.J.
Defendants appeal from a decision of the Macomb County Circuit Court which held that the City of Mount Clemens was estopped from enforcing its residency requirement against the nine named plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are employed in various capacities by the city.
*17In 1956, the city adopted personnel rule 6.1, which provides:
"Residence: Employees in the competitive service need not be residents of the City of Mount Clemens at the time of appointment, but shall establish residence within the City within one year after appointment and shall maintain such residence during employment by the City.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Parker v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Township of Blackman v. KollerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Highland Park v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Gossman v. LambrechtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Beaussaert v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sanders v. Racing CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cross v. WhedonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sanders v. Racing CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986