Legal Opinion
Pines v. Traktman
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Actions to foreclose tax liens.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
These two cases were by consent of counsel tried together. They are actions for the- foreclosure of tax liens on certain premises in the borough of Brooklyn and are defended by the defendant Celia Moliver, who holds the record title under a deed from the Roosevelt Hospital, on the ground that the premises, as the property of the Roosevelt Hospital, were exempt from taxation, and hence the tax liens are void. The corporation counsel has, accordingly, taken over the prosecution of the actions on behalf of the City of New York.
The validity of the tax liens is sought to be sup•ported mainly upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rochester Railway Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Rochester v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- New York University v. . American Book Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cutting v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Mickles v. TousleyNew York Supreme Court · 1823
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hammond v. Antwerp Light & Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Effell Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Pines v. TraktmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- United States v. 25.4 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1943