Legal Opinion

Fast Horse v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 6, 2018No. 17-1776Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

$ffif #$ruAL FILED llntW @nftrU btsttg @ourt of ftUerul @l,nimg FEB - 6 ?otg No. 17-1776C (Pro Se) U.S. COURT OF (Filed: February 6, 2018 | Not for Publication) FEDERAL CLAIMS Keywords: Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject LAVERN CHARLES FAST HORSE, Matter Jurisdiction; 42 U.S.C. $ 1983; Clarton Antitrust Act: RICO. Plaintiff, THE T'NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Lavern Charles Fast Horse,Indiart Springs, NV, pro se. Mark E. Porada, Trial Attomey, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom were Claudia Burke, Assistant Dtrector, Robert E.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Bernard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Marilyn A. Bobula v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API