Legal Opinion

Sentry Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 19, 1995No. 94-3428PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Sentry Insurance and Linda A. Schwallie appeal an order imposing sanctions and a judgment dismissing their complaint against Royal Insurance Company of America and General Motors. Sentry contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Royal additional time to answer the complaint and by denying Sentry's motion for default judgment. Sentry further contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by prohibiting the introduction of any evidence concerning the condition of a refrigerator as a sanction for improperly engaging in destructive testing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Gerth v. American Star InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Casper v. American International South InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lambert v. HeinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Cease Electric Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API