Legal Opinion
Douglas v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 26, 2004No. CIV.A.03-1340 (RMU), CR.A.01-0197-01 RMUPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Petitioner’s Post-Sentence Motion for Relief
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the pro se petitioner’s motion for relief from the sentence that he currently is serving. Specifically, he asks the court to grant him a downward departure from the applicable sentencing guideline range and to disregard the sentence enhancement triggered' by his possession of firearms at the time of , the underlying drug offense. The court denies the petitioner’s request for downward departure because it lacks merit. As for the petitioner’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. WN128398 v. The Best Quality Care, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. ZagorskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016