Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J), dated February 6, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. Robert I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API