Legal Opinion

Evans v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 8425SC1058Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The defendant contends that the trial judge erred by denying his motion for directed verdict as to the plaintiffs’ negligence claim. The defendant’s contention has merit.

The defendant argues that plaintiffs were the second purchasers of the house at issue and therefore could not bring suit for negligence against the builder. In Oates v. JAG, Inc., 66 N.C. App. 244, 311 S.E. 2d 369, disc. rev. allowed, 311 N.C. 761, 321 S.E. 2d 142 (1984), this Court held that a subsequent purchaser of a house, once removed from the original vendee, may not maintain an action against the original…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Colony Hill Condominium I Ass'n v. Colony Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API